Round Table India
You Are Reading
TISS Alumni Stand In Support of Striking Students
tiss students strike





tiss students strike

We, the alumni of the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, offer our support to the call made by the TISS Students Union for a strike on 21st February 2018 against the decisions taken by the institute to deny the fee exemption given to SC, ST and OBC students (including religious minorities) who are eligible to the Government of India Post-Matric Scholarship (GoI-PMS) . The fee exemption to students was an institute policy to facilitate access to higher education to students from marginalised communities. But over the years, fees of TISS increased many folds (currently, average fees is around Rs. 70-80,000 per semester) while the policy of affirmative access was curtailed bit by bit. We condemn the move by the administration and management of TISS. The situation has worsened with Government’s policy of increasing privatisation of education and inadequate allocation of funds to provide for access to higher education by students from marginalised communities. Government has been decreasing allocation for GoI PMS schemes and, in particular, withholding significant funds to TISS from the University Grants Commission and Ministry of Human Resource Development.

History of social justice in TISS and worrying trends

The history of social justice in TISS admission was a struggle like in other higher educational institutes in India with significant number of Dalit Bahujan Adivasi students entering the campus after the Mandal Commission recommendations being enforced in the year 2006 and pressure from various quarters. Social work education had been a domain of the privileged castes and class, only till recently.

The case of TISS is unique as the fee ranges about 70-80,000 per semester, which is incomparable to the other Central Universities like JNU, HCU, EFLU etc. Although the Institute tries to defend the high fee by putting it alongside IITs and IIMs, the elite character and the anti-reservation character of these ‘elite’ institutes is well known. Moreover, any comparison can be made only between like institutions, and IITs and IIMs are far distinct from TISS in terms of the kind of courses they offer and the vision that they entail.

Over the past 5-6 years, there has been a constant betrayal of any measure of social justice which the institute has been claiming to have. Firstly, the fee was hiked from 2013-14 to almost double the amount in 2016-17, with a 45% increase in the intervening years of 2015 and 2016. The high fees of TISS, can by no way match the meagre GoI PMS amount that the government disburses. TISS, in a measure of positive social justice, provided fee exemption in most heads for SC, ST and OBC students who are eligible for the GoI-PMS scholarship. But, this facility was withdrawn for the OBC students from the 2015 batch and finally in 2017, institute went ahead to withdraw the same for SC and ST students as well. This resulted in almost impossible situation for students because they were asked to pay the full fees upfront.

These actions will result in complete absence of students from oppressed communities to participate in higher education in TISS, as the financial aid and GoI-PMS cannot match the fees. Also, with the introduction of Direct Bank Transfer of scholarship, the institute has washed its hands off any responsibility of providing fee exemption arguing that the scholarship is an individual transaction between the student and the government.

The situation for OBC students in Maharashtra is an example that reservation is not enough for retention in institutes that charge high fees like TISS. Scholarship and fee exemptions for the students is equally necessary. With the implementation of Mandal Recommendation (Stage 2), and access to fee exception and the GoI scholarship, there was increase in the number of students in higher education till the year 2014-15. But within an year, these figures reduced drastically with denial of fee exemption for students from OBC category: for Maharashtra in particular number of students decreased from 65 to only 20 (16 MA and 4 MPhil/PhD scholars) while overall it decreased from 97 to 47. With the recent decision to roll back the fee exemption for SC and ST students, there is likely to be a continuity of this trend.

Decreasing allocation of GoI PMS and fund cuts in TISS

The part played by the central government in this saga of depriving eligible students to quality higher education also needs to be condemned in equal measure. India’s overall budgetary allocation to education has been just between 3.5-4 percent of total expenditure in past many years, which is the lowest as compared to countries like Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa. Further, the government is taking measures to privatise education, resulting in increase in cost of education, and at the same time reducing funds allocated towards policies of affirmative action. The less allocated budget to education and scholarships in particular, has given free hand to the government to increase cost recovery through student fees and student loans both in state and central institutions.

Even this year, the allocation to the University Grants Commission (UGC) has been reduced to Rs 4,722.7 crores from a revised estimate of Rs 4,922.7 crores. The total grants to Central Universities has also been reduced to Rs 6,445.2 crores , significantly lower than the revised estimate of Rs 7,261.4 crores in 2017-2018. On the other hand, few select ‘premier’ institutions are given disproportionate funding resulting in a chatur-varna (four fold caste system) of higher education, with the state and central university getting worst treatment. For TISS, the central government has cut significant amount of funds in the Non-Planned budget category over the past 3-4 years, which has made the matters worse. Additionally, the allocation to the Post Matric Scholarship to any of the states has not matched the requirement. To illustrate through an example, as per Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment last annual report, the allocated funds for GoI-PMS scholarship for SCs, who are 16% of our country’s population, is a mere Rs. 61 crores. The allocation to Ministry of Minority Affair (MoMA) for scholarships have also come down.

Students sleeping near gate of TISS

In conclusion, we alumni stand with the agitating students, especially Dalit Bahujan Adivasi Minority students, who are fighting for their rightful and constitutionally guaranteed right to education. We condemn, in the strongest terms, the series of decisions of the TISS administration curtailing the access to higher education to the historically oppressed communities. As a centrally funded university, its duty does not end with giving admission as per constitutional provision, but is equally responsible for e retention of students. No student shall be denied admission in the university on the basis of his financial condition, nor shall they be forced to leave the university for economic reasons. Further, we condemn the governmental apathy and withdrawal of support mechanism for students to complete higher education including the lack of funds for scholarships.

We demand

 ● The TISS Administration gives fee exemption to SC, ST and OBC students who are eligible for GoI-PMS
● Extension of Financial aid mechanism for more students. We condemn the decision of the administration to provide the aid without consideration to social background of students.
● Government of India should increase allocation to centrally and state funded universities and the PMS provisions so that no student is denied the right to higher education



Baljeet Kaur, MA Social Work in Criminology and Justice, 2017
Nikita Bhukar, M.A. Social Work (CJ), 2017
Abid Faheem, MA Social Work in Children & Families, 2017
Prerna Gupta, M. A. Media and Cultural studies, 2017
Sheethal, LLM in Access to Justice, 2014
Sreejith Murali, MPhil (Education), 2017
Vipul Kumar, MA Social Work in Criminology and Justice, 2014
Ankita Bhatkhande, Media and cultural studies, 2015
Abir Dasgupta, MA Media and Cultural Studies, 2017
Ufaque Paiker, MA Media and Cultural Studies, 2012
Swapnil Bagul, 2015-17, 2017
Firdaus Soni, MA SMCS, 2015
Saurav Aman, MA in Development Studies, 2017
Rahul Adwani, MA in Development Studies, 2017
Lynne Henry K, MA in Media and Cultural Studies, 2010
Nayantara Nayar, Media and Cultural Studies, 2016
Sameer Gardner, 2015, 2017
Kritika Agarawal, MA in Media and Cultural Studies, 2015
Farhana Latief, LLM, 2014
Rahul Adwani, Development Studies, 2017
Abha Kumari, M.A in Social work (wcp), 2016
Aditi Maddali, SMCS, 2015
Nikita Agarwal, MA in Women Centered Practices, 2017
Sandeep Ghusale, MA Social Work in Criminology and Justice, 2014
Mukesh Baa, DTSA, 2015
Sagar Jagtap, MA Social Work in Criminology and Justice, 2017
Rajashree Gandhi, Media and Cultural Studies, 2014
Sharib Ali, MA in Media and Cultural Studies, 2012
Naveli Gupta, MA Social Work in Children and Families, 2017
Akhil Vasudevan, MA in Media and Cultural Studies, 2017
Abhishek Tiwari, MA Social Work in CODP, 2014
Vinod Shinde, M.A in social work (dalit and tribal studies and action), 2017
Afreen Bano Khan, LLM, 2016
Noor Amina, MA in Development Studies, 2017
Raju Chalwadi, MA Development Studies, 2015
Arpan Bag, MA Social Work in Criminology and Justice, 2017
Vineetha Venugopal, MA Social Work in Community Organisation and Development Practices, 2017
Mayur Helia, MA Social Work in Dalit and Tribal Studies, 2017
Rajendra Jadhav, MA (Media and Cultural Studies), 2016
Neeraj Kumar, MA Social Work in Public Health, 2017
Shatakshy Bhatt, MA Social Work in CODP, 2017
Monalisa Barman MA Social Work in Dalit and Tribal Studies 2017
Atul Anand MA in Media and Cultural Studies 2015
Aditya Chandanshive, social work in Dalit and Tribal Studies and Action, 2015-17
Ankur Otto, MSW in Criminology and Justice, 2015
Ketan Wankhede, M.A. In social Work In Dalit And Tribal Studies and Action, 2017
Babu P.c., M.A. In Social Work in Dalit And Tribal Studies And Action, 2017
Ashima Chaudhary, M.A. in social work, 2011
Jaydeep Solanki, MA Social Work in Livelihoods and Social Entrepreneurship, 2015-17
Aiman Khan, M.A in Women’s Studies, 2016
Amit Balmiki, M. A in Dalit and Tribal Studies and Action, 2017
Preethish Raja, M.A. Social Work in Dalit and Tribal Studies and Action, 2015-2017
Priya K, LL.M. in Access to Justice, 2014
Koushik Mahato, MA Social Work in Criminology and Justice, 2017
Mathew Jacob, MA Social Work, 2010
Nitika MA, social work (CODP), 2017
Naveen, MA in Development Studies 2017
Nikhil Ambekar, MA Media and Cultural Studies Second Year, Mar-18
Eashaan Kappagantula, M.A in Development Studies, 2017
Abhishek, Dta, 2015
Virendra Dhoke, DTA, 2017
Aditi Saraswat, MA Media and Cultural Studies, 2016
Joyeeta Bhattacharjee, Masters in Social Work, Centre for Social Justice and Governance, 2017
Amrutha K P, MA Media and Cultural Studies, 2017
Anita Pagare, NA, NA
Bhamini Lakshminarayan, MA in Media and Cultural Studies, 2017
Aparna Srivastava, Media and Cultural Studies, 2017
Tanya Mishra, MA media and cultural studies, 2017
Swapnil Gedam, MA Habitat Studies, 2014
Amrutha K P, MA Media and Cultural Studies, 2015-17
Sandeep Sreelekha, Media and Cultural Studies, 2017
Abhimanyu Singh, Media and Cultural Studies, 2017
Anjana Krishnan, MA Social Work 2017



[Via Raju Chalwadi]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.